Terjemahan Abstrak Skripsi Alasan Kasasi Penuntut Umum Terhadap Putusan Judex Factie Membebaskan Terdakwa
ABSTRAK
Intan Clara
Permata Hati. NIM E0014206. ALASAN KASASI PENUNTUT UMUM TERHADAP PUTUSAN JUDEX
FACTI MEMBEBASKAN TERDAKWA DARI DAKWAAN DAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM AGUNG MENGADILI
SENDIRI PERKARA PENIPUAN (STUDI KASUS MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 519 K / PID / 2017). Fakultas Hukum
Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Tujuan
penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan alasan Penuntut Umum mengajukan
Kasasi berdasarkan putusan judex factie membebaskan terdakwa dari dakwaan dan
pertimbangan Hakim Agung mengadili sendiri perkara penipuan sudah sesuai dengan
Pasal 253 ayat (1) huruf a KUHAP dan pertimbangan hakim menjatuhkan sanksi
pidana sesuai dengan Pasal 256 KUHAP..
Ditinjau dari
jenis penelitian hukum yang penulis lakukan termasuk jenis penelitian hukum
normatif yang bersifat preskriptif. Bahan hukum yang digunakan meliputi bahan
hukum primer dan sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah
studi pustaka, selanjutnya teknik analisis yang digunakan adalah metode
deduktif silogisme.
Berdasarkan
hasil penelitian dan pembahasan menunjukan bahwa ada kesesuaian antara pasal
253 KUHAP dengan alasan Penuntut Umum mengajukan Kasasi berdasarkan putusan
judex factie membebaskan terdakwa dari dakwaan dan pertimbangan Hakim Agung
mengadili sendiri perkara penipuan sudah sesuai dengan Pasal 253 ayat (1) huruf
a KUHAP, dan pertimbangan hakim menjatuhkan sanksi pidana sesuai dengan Pasal
256 KUHAP. Sehingga Putusan Mahkamah agung Nomor 519 K/PID.B/2017 sudah sesuai
karena memenuhi syarat-syarat formil pada KUHAP maupun syarat-syarat materiil pada Pasal 253 ayat (1) KUHAP.
Kata Kunci : Kasasi, Pertimbangan Hakim, Penipuan
(TERJEMAHAN)
ABSTRACT
Intan Clara
Permata Hati. NIM E0014206. REASON OF THE PROSECUTOR FILED CASSATION ON JUDEX
FACTIE DECISION ACQUITTED THE DEFENDANT FROM HIS INDICTMENT AND THE
CONSIDERATION OF SUPREME JUDGE PROSECUTED THE FRAUD CASE (A STUDY ON SUPREME
COURT DECISION NUMBER 519 K / PID / 2017). Faculty of Law. Sebelas Maret University.
This
study aims to describe the reason of the prosecutor filed cassation based on
Judex Factie decision acquitted the defendant from his indictment and the
consideration of Supreme Judge prosecuted the fraud case are in accordance with
Article 253 paragraph (1) letter a of the Criminal Code Procedure and the Judge’s
consideration to impose criminal sanction are in accordance with Article 256 of
the Criminal Code Procedure.
This
research is a normative legal research with prescriptive characteristic. This
research used primary and secondary legal materials. The technique of
collecting legal sources was obtained through the study of literature. The
legal sources was analyzed based on the deductive syllogism method.
Based
on the results and discussion, it is shows that there are compatibility between
Article 253 of Criminal Code Procedure and the reason of the prosecutor filed
cassation based on Judex Factie decision acquitted the defendant from his
indictment and the Supreme Judge’s consideration to prosecute the cases of
fraud are in accordance with Article 253 paragrah (1) letter a of the Criminal
Code Procedure, and the Judge’s consideration to impose criminal sanction are
in accordance with Article 256 of the Criminal Code Procedure. Therefore,
Supreme Court Decision number 519 K/PID.B/2017 is suitable because it meets the
formal requirements in the Criminal Code Procedure and the material
requirements in Article 253 clause (1) of the Criminal Code Procedure.
Key words : Cassation, Comsideration of the Judge, Fraud
Poin Penting terjemahan istilah hukum dalam abstrak ini:
Indonesian
|
English
|
Penuntut Umum
|
Prosecutor
|
Terdakwa
|
Defendant
|
Hakim Agung
|
Supreme Judge
|
Mahkamah Agung
|
Supreme Court
|
Penipuan
|
Fraud
|
Kasasi
|
Cassation
|
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP)
|
Criminal Code Procedure
|
Penelitian Hukum Normatif
|
Normative Legal Research
|
Pasal
|
Article
|
Comments
Post a Comment